Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-07-01 → 1996-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-05-01 → 1996-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-04-01 → 1996-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-03-01 → 1996-03-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-02-01 → 1996-02-29 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-01-01 → 1996-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-01-01 → 1996-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-12-01 → 1995-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-11-01 → 1995-11-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-10-01 → 1995-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 121 µg/L 151% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 221/244 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 309 µg/L No EPA limit set | 212/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 114 µg/L No EPA limit set | 211/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set | 192/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 110 µg/L 183% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 171/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 47 µg/L No EPA limit set | 138/242 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 80 µg/L No EPA limit set | 138/242 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 114/242 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1100 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 59/77 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 56/240 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 42/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 960 µg/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 5.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/243 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 120 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 9/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 2.2 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 540 µg/L 5.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Arsenic | 1.1 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 6.8 µg/L 113% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 6 µg/L | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
82 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Norwich City
Is Norwich City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Norwich City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Norwich City's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Norwich City serve?
Norwich City reports serving 8,000 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Norwich City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 47 violations on file for Norwich City, of which 30 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.