← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Pequannock Twp Wd-Cedar Crest

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
1,463
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Morris

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
38
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-12-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
18.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
81.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
103 µg/L 129%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
63.7 µg/L 106%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
26.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
500 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
28/30 SYR4 2013–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2024
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
4/30 SYR4 2013–2018
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
SEUGLING, DAVID
Phone
973-261-3712

Frequently asked questions about Pequannock Twp Wd-Cedar Crest

Is Pequannock Twp Wd-Cedar Crest tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Pequannock Twp Wd-Cedar Crest's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pequannock Twp Wd-Cedar Crest's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pequannock Twp Wd-Cedar Crest serve?

Pequannock Twp Wd-Cedar Crest reports serving 1,463 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Pequannock Twp Wd-Cedar Crest had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 38 violations on file for Pequannock Twp Wd-Cedar Crest, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.