Tap WaterIndex

← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

Aberdeen - Freneau

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
286
people served
8
health-based violations
New Jersey rankingsLead in New JerseyPFAS in New Jersey
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Monmouth

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
72
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-07-01 → 2011-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-01-01 → 2011-03-31
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2026-03-11
MON Monitoring Archived 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 14/14 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
20.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
69.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.39 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
94 µg/L 118%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
61 µg/L 102%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
 9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
47.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 9/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 4/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
65 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 2/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.69 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/9 SYR4 2012–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidLead

Utility contact

Contact
CACERES, SANDRA
Phone
732-583-4200

Frequently asked questions about Aberdeen - Freneau

Is Aberdeen - Freneau tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Aberdeen - Freneau's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Aberdeen - Freneau's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Aberdeen - Freneau serve?

Aberdeen - Freneau reports serving 286 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has Aberdeen - Freneau had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 72 violations on file for Aberdeen - Freneau, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.