Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2022-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2022-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2022-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-03-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-03-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-09-01 → 2019-09-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 57.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.76 µg/L No EPA limit set | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 74.1 µg/L 93% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 63/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 54.4 µg/L 91% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 62/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 60/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set | 49/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 43/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 32.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 36/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.9200 µg/L No EPA limit set | 27/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.31 µg/L No EPA limit set | 25/63 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00045 mg/L 3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 300 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 15/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 3 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 5/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.42 pCi/L 68% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lithium | 13.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/6 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Barium | 130 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
62 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Englishtown Water Dept
Is Englishtown Water Dept tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Englishtown Water Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Englishtown Water Dept's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Englishtown Water Dept serve?
Englishtown Water Dept reports serving 2,504 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.
Has Englishtown Water Dept had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 69 violations on file for Englishtown Water Dept, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.