← New Jersey

Tap water quality report

City of Bayonne

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
14
detected
63,000
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hudson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
64
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1995-01-01 → 1998-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-12-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01 → 2017-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFOA 0.0046 µg/L 3/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
16.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
249/249 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
76.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
249/249 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
249/249 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
89 µg/L 111%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
249/249 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
47.3 µg/L 79%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
249/249 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
32.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
249/249 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
251.3 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
230/240 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.61 µg/L
No EPA limit set
211/249 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
81/249 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
27 µg/L 180%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
73/240 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0045 mg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
25/25 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/249 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/249 SYR4 2012–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
LIBITZ, JOHN
Phone
201-852-0324
Email
JOHN.LIBITZ@VEOLIA.COM

Frequently asked questions about City of Bayonne

Is City of Bayonne tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in City of Bayonne's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Bayonne's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Bayonne serve?

City of Bayonne reports serving 63,000 people in New Jersey, per its EPA record.

Has City of Bayonne had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 64 violations on file for City of Bayonne, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.