← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Heath Brook Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 68 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

68
contaminants tested
6
detected
36
people served
10
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Strafford

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

10
health-based violations
124
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-12-01 → 1993-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
23.8 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2015–2018
Barium
13.4 µg/L 0.7%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Fluoride
450 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
11.2 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2015–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.5000 pCi/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
3 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HAROLD SMITH

Frequently asked questions about Heath Brook Estates

Is Heath Brook Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Heath Brook Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Heath Brook Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Barium, Fluoride, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Heath Brook Estates serve?

Heath Brook Estates reports serving 36 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Heath Brook Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 124 violations on file for Heath Brook Estates, of which 10 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.