Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Green Hills Ests

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 13 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

13
contaminants tested
10
detected
618
people served
4
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Rockingham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
6
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
163 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 227.208 µg/L
21/21 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
7.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
19.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
4.52 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
29.4 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
9.45 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.9 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.825 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
5.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
1.13527 µg/L 7.6%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 1/21 SYR4 2014–2017
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
LESLIE MORGAN

Frequently asked questions about Green Hills Ests

Is Green Hills Ests tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Green Hills Ests's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Green Hills Ests's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Green Hills Ests serve?

Green Hills Ests reports serving 618 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Green Hills Ests had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 6 violations on file for Green Hills Ests, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.