Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Badger Hill

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
13
detected
455
people served
0
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Hillsborough

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
2
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2010-07-01 → 2010-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
237.83 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 28/28 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 7/7 SYR4 2016–2019
Chloroform
3.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 7/7 SYR4 2016–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 7/7 SYR4 2016–2019
TTHM
10 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 7/7 SYR4 2016–2019
Bromoform
0.7000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/7 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Uranium
6.76951 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 4/4 SYR4 2016–2017
Barium
132 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2014–2019
Fluoride
308 µg/L 7.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
2.22489 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 3/25 SYR4 2016–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.6 pCi/L 32%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 2/4 SYR4 2016–2017
Chromium
1.218 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2014–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
5 pCi/L 33%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/4 SYR4 2016–2017
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LESLIE MORGAN

Frequently asked questions about Badger Hill

Is Badger Hill tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Badger Hill's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Badger Hill's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Badger Hill serve?

Badger Hill reports serving 455 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Badger Hill had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2 violations on file for Badger Hill, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.