← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Mt Laurel Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 66 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

66
contaminants tested
7
detected
115
people served
17
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hillsborough

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

17
health-based violations
39
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2016-10-21
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-04-22
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-04-22
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-04-22
TT Health-based Resolved 2015-04-22
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
417 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 550 µg/L
64/65 SYR4 2014–2018
Lead
26.5 µg/L 177%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L
31/63 SYR4 2014–2018
Arsenic
8 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
25/25 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
66.7 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
279.5 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0260 mg/L 173%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
2/2 LCR 2015
Combined Uranium
4.1 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2017
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LEE MINNICH

Frequently asked questions about Mt Laurel Estates

Is Mt Laurel Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Mt Laurel Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mt Laurel Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mt Laurel Estates serve?

Mt Laurel Estates reports serving 115 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Mt Laurel Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 39 violations on file for Mt Laurel Estates, of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.