Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Grasmere Wp/Landmark

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 13 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

13
contaminants tested
8
detected
90
people served
8
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hillsborough

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
35
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-04-01 → 2005-06-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
117.37 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 118 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2015–2018
Bromodichloromethane
1.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
3.725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.7750 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
5.975 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.85 µg/L 9.7%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
1.88 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
3/10 SYR4 2015–2018
5 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTrichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
CHRISTINE DANIELS

Frequently asked questions about Grasmere Wp/Landmark

Is Grasmere Wp/Landmark tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Grasmere Wp/Landmark's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Grasmere Wp/Landmark's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Grasmere Wp/Landmark serve?

Grasmere Wp/Landmark reports serving 90 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Grasmere Wp/Landmark had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 35 violations on file for Grasmere Wp/Landmark, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.