Tap WaterIndex

← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Inn at Deerfield

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 73 contaminants and detected 4. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

73
contaminants tested
4
detected
57
people served
0
health-based violations
New Hampshire rankingsLead in New HampshirePFAS in New Hampshire
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Rockingham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
14
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2019-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2017-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2017-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2017-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-10-01 → 2017-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-10-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2011-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
120 µg/L 9.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 12/12 SYR4 2015–2019
Fluoride
898.5 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 900 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2018
Lead
1.95 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Uranium
2.2 µg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2015
69 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DAN MAHONEY

Frequently asked questions about Inn at Deerfield

Is Inn at Deerfield tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 4 contaminants in Inn at Deerfield's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Inn at Deerfield's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Combined Uranium. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Inn at Deerfield serve?

Inn at Deerfield reports serving 57 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Inn at Deerfield had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 14 violations on file for Inn at Deerfield, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.