← New Hampshire

Tap water quality report

Riverside Cobb Farm

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 69 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

69
contaminants tested
8
detected
75
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Carroll

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
6
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-04-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Fluoride
2880 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2990 µg/L
24/24 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
119 µg/L 9.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 140 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
2.2954 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Mercury
0.2521 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2580 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Chromium
1.39 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3000 pCi/L 6%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Lead
0.0310 mg/L 207%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
1/1 LCR 1993
Lead
1.694 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/10 SYR4 2014–2017
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMethoxychlorNitrateNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DAVID PUBLICOVER

Frequently asked questions about Riverside Cobb Farm

Is Riverside Cobb Farm tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Riverside Cobb Farm's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Riverside Cobb Farm's water?

EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Barium, Mercury, Chromium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Riverside Cobb Farm serve?

Riverside Cobb Farm reports serving 75 people in New Hampshire, per its EPA record.

Has Riverside Cobb Farm had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 6 violations on file for Riverside Cobb Farm, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.