← Nebraska

Tap water quality report

Shannon Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
13
detected
100
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Washington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-04-01 → 2010-06-30
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2007-10-01 → 2007-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
23.215 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
62.405 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 64.4 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.968 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
22.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29.9 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
90.865 µg/L 114%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.7 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
40.635 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 47.9 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
15.045 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.6 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.92 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.98 µg/L
26/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
183.2 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 277 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
1.007 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.16 µg/L
10/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2024
Lead
1.0238 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.03 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.029 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.03 µg/L
2/32 SYR4 2012–2019
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
VILLOTTA, TODD
Phone
402-426-8122
Email
todd.villotta@pearson.com

Frequently asked questions about Shannon Estates

Is Shannon Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Shannon Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Shannon Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Shannon Estates serve?

Shannon Estates reports serving 100 people in Nebraska, per its EPA record.

Has Shannon Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Shannon Estates, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.