← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

South Point Sd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
10
detected
124
people served
24
health-based violations
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cumberland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

24
health-based violations
78
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-10
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-10
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-12-10
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-11-01 → 2024-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1612.6 µg/L 124%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
35/138 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
49.3088 µg/L 329%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
28/138 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0246 mg/L 164%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
5.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Chloroform
7.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Dibromochloromethane
2.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
TTHM
15.8 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.4 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/3 SYR4 2014–2018
4 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
HALL, AMY
Phone
910-678-7637
Email
ahall@cumberlandcountync.gov

Frequently asked questions about South Point Sd

Is South Point Sd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in South Point Sd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in South Point Sd's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does South Point Sd serve?

South Point Sd reports serving 124 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has South Point Sd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 78 violations on file for South Point Sd, of which 24 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.