Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 462 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 16/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 18.3 µg/L 122% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 12/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Nitrate | 2500 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Uranium | 13.8868 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 8/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 10.4 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2500 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 20 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.8 pCi/L 56% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 370 µg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 0.5200 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 0.8700 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 1.9 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 9.5 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.2 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
61 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Old Milburnie Crossing S/D
Is Old Milburnie Crossing S/D tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Old Milburnie Crossing S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Old Milburnie Crossing S/D's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Combined Uranium, Gross Beta Particle Activity, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Old Milburnie Crossing S/D serve?
Old Milburnie Crossing S/D reports serving 262 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Old Milburnie Crossing S/D had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 3 violations on file for Old Milburnie Crossing S/D, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.