Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-03-01 → 2010-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 132.1 µg/L 165% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 39/39 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 53 µg/L 88% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 39/39 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 25.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 97.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10 µg/L No EPA limit set | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 31.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 23 µg/L No EPA limit set | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 18/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 25 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 5/20 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 14 µg/L 93% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 4/20 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 3/3 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromoform | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/34 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Smithfield South Water Dist
Is Smithfield South Water Dist tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Smithfield South Water Dist's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Smithfield South Water Dist's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Smithfield South Water Dist serve?
Smithfield South Water Dist reports serving 803 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Smithfield South Water Dist had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 23 violations on file for Smithfield South Water Dist, of which 11 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.