Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

The Hills of Rosemont

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
12
detected
192
people served
72
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Chatham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

72
health-based violations
149
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-07-01 → 2015-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Combined Uranium
58.6166 µg/L 195%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 77.331 µg/L
17/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2025
Copper
123.82 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 134 µg/L
5/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
35.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 36 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Dibromochloromethane
6.59 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Fluoride
206 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 210 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
42.9 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 43 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Bromodichloromethane
1.29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
21.2 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2014–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.7 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2014–2018
66 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoLeadMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LEINBACH, CHAD
Email
chad.leinbach@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about The Hills of Rosemont

Is The Hills of Rosemont tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in The Hills of Rosemont's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in The Hills of Rosemont's water?

EPA monitoring detected Combined Uranium, Lead, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does The Hills of Rosemont serve?

The Hills of Rosemont reports serving 192 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has The Hills of Rosemont had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 149 violations on file for The Hills of Rosemont, of which 72 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.