Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Shiloh Church Road S/D

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
9
detected
3,102
people served
14
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Cabarrus

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

14
health-based violations
137
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
65.4 µg/L 109%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
 60/60 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
135.1 µg/L 169%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 59/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
39.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
29.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
116.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 56/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 44/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 25/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 1/1 LCR 2025
5 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformCopperDibromoacetic AcidLeadMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MELTON, WILMER
Phone
704-920-4231
Email
wmelton@kannapolisnc.gov

Frequently asked questions about Shiloh Church Road S/D

Is Shiloh Church Road S/D tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Shiloh Church Road S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Shiloh Church Road S/D's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Shiloh Church Road S/D serve?

Shiloh Church Road S/D reports serving 3,102 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Shiloh Church Road S/D had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 137 violations on file for Shiloh Church Road S/D, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.