Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Bridge Creek

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
14
detected
25
people served
0
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Jackson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
20
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2020-04-01 → 2020-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 6/6 LCR 2025
Combined Uranium
3.71904 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7399 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
247 µg/L 6.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
5.9 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
3/20 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
18.93 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Bromodichloromethane
4.385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Chloroform
14.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Dibromochloromethane
1.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.455 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.0515 pCi/L 7%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.07 pCi/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.69 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Bromoform
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2017
Copper
60 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 1/20 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2017
66 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SMITHIE, AMANDA
Phone
828-650-6875
Email
info@ipmhoa.com

Frequently asked questions about Bridge Creek

Is Bridge Creek tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Bridge Creek's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Bridge Creek's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Combined Uranium, Fluoride, Lead, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Bridge Creek serve?

Bridge Creek reports serving 25 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Bridge Creek had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 20 violations on file for Bridge Creek, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.