← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Jeter Mountain Mhp

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
7
detected
54
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Henderson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
48
violations on file
8
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Addressed 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Addressed 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Addressed 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Addressed 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Addressed 2024-10-01
MR Monitoring Addressed 2024-10-01
Other Monitoring Addressed 2024-09-27
Other Monitoring Addressed 2024-09-27
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2024-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1310 µg/L 101%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
25/42 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
74 µg/L 493%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
23/42 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
3310 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2022
Combined Uranium
3.0545 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Fluoride
122 µg/L 3.1%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Toluene
0.8000 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2012–2018
68 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Total Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
VOIGT, PETER
Email
jetermountain@yahoo.com

Frequently asked questions about Jeter Mountain Mhp

Is Jeter Mountain Mhp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Jeter Mountain Mhp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Jeter Mountain Mhp's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Lead, Combined Uranium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Jeter Mountain Mhp serve?

Jeter Mountain Mhp reports serving 54 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Jeter Mountain Mhp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 48 violations on file for Jeter Mountain Mhp, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 8 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.