Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Walnut Creek Village

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
950
people served
4
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Wayne

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
178
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-11-01 → 1993-11-30
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-08-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-08-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-08-11
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2025-08-11
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1476 µg/L 114%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
 88/92 SYR4 2013–2017
Lead
70 µg/L 467%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
 23/92 SYR4 2013–2017
TTHM
22.2 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
14.5 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 10/10 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
12.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 10/10 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
6.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 10/10 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 10/10 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 9/10 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 2/2 LCR 2025
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/10 SYR4 2014–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
PARCHMAN, ROBERT
Phone
919-778-9687
Email
robert.parchman@walnutcreeknc.com

Frequently asked questions about Walnut Creek Village

Is Walnut Creek Village tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Walnut Creek Village's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Walnut Creek Village's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Walnut Creek Village serve?

Walnut Creek Village reports serving 950 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Walnut Creek Village had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 178 violations on file for Walnut Creek Village, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.