Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-10-01 → 2017-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 121.2 µg/L 152% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 139 µg/L | 35/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 56.45 µg/L 94% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 92 µg/L | 34/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 44.5625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 52.95 µg/L | 28/36 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 50.6525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58.77 µg/L | 28/36 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 26.629 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.84 µg/L | 28/36 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 20 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58 µg/L | 27/36 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 27.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L | 26/36 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 23/36 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.59275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.838 µg/L | 16/36 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Copper | 1001 µg/L 77% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1250 µg/L | 11/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 5/5 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 4/36 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 5.8184 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 3/25 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/36 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Oyster Point S/D
Is Oyster Point S/D tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Oyster Point S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Oyster Point S/D's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Oyster Point S/D serve?
Oyster Point S/D reports serving 99 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Oyster Point S/D had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 153 violations on file for Oyster Point S/D, of which 39 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.