Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

South Ridge Mhp

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 78 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

78
contaminants tested
13
detected
115
people served
0
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
New Hanover

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
59
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Addressed 2025-01-01
MR Monitoring Addressed 2025-01-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-08-01 → 2020-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-08-01 → 2020-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-08-01 → 2020-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-08-01 → 2020-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-08-01 → 2020-08-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2020-08-01 → 2020-08-31
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2020-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
12.9105 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.13 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
44.6385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 48.81 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
12.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
60.3 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 66 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
26.05 µg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
4/5 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0060 mg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 3/3 LCR 2025
Copper
58.166 µg/L 4.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 58.28 µg/L
2/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
2.84015 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.937 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloromethane
2.849 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
 1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
100 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
9 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 1/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/5 SYR4 2013–2019
65 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ALLEN, JUSTIN
Email
jballen2@alumni.ncsu.edu

Frequently asked questions about South Ridge Mhp

Is South Ridge Mhp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in South Ridge Mhp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in South Ridge Mhp's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does South Ridge Mhp serve?

South Ridge Mhp reports serving 115 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has South Ridge Mhp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 59 violations on file for South Ridge Mhp, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.