← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

The Cape Master

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
21
detected
11,587
people served
39
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
New Hanover

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

39
health-based violations
181
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0046 µg/L 5/24 2025
Hfpo-Da 0.0084 µg/L 2/24 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
110 µg/L 138%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
61/61 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
35.2 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L
59/60 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
16.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
42.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
14.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
39/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
22.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
39/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
32.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
37/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
76.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 87 µg/L
18/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
12.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
17/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Copper
313.25 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 317 µg/L
16/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
455 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
16/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2024
Lead
6.9975 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
6/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Gross Beta Particle Activity
13.645 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.5 pCi/L
4/10 SYR4 2016–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.71 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
4/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Xylenes, Total
7.42 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L
3/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
17.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/24 UCMR-5 2025
Dalapon
1.1 µg/L 0.6%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
2/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Ethylbenzene
1.2 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
1/36 SYR4 2012–2019
87 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumDichloromethaneDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MILLIRON, BRENT
Phone
919-653-6999
Email
bmilliron@aquaamerica.com

Frequently asked questions about The Cape Master

Is The Cape Master tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in The Cape Master's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in The Cape Master's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does The Cape Master serve?

The Cape Master reports serving 11,587 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has The Cape Master had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 181 violations on file for The Cape Master, of which 39 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.