Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTHM | 110 µg/L 138% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 61/61 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 35.2 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L | 59/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 16.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 42.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54 µg/L | 42/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 39/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 22.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 39/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 32.6 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 37/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 76.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 87 µg/L | 18/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 12.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 17/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Copper | 313.25 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 317 µg/L | 16/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 455 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L | 16/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0030 mg/L 20% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2024 |
| Lead | 6.9975 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 6/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 13.645 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.5 pCi/L | 4/10 | SYR4 | 2016–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.71 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L | 4/42 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 7.42 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 3/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 17.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/24 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Dalapon | 1.1 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 2/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 1.2 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/36 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about The Cape Master
Is The Cape Master tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in The Cape Master's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in The Cape Master's water?
EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does The Cape Master serve?
The Cape Master reports serving 11,587 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has The Cape Master had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 181 violations on file for The Cape Master, of which 39 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.