Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-05-01 → 2003-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-05-01 → 2003-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-05-01 → 2003-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2003-05-01 → 2003-05-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1385 µg/L 107% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2690 µg/L | 19/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 444 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 470 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 4.06 µg/L 5.1% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 5/11 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 6.34 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 pCi/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 6.2185 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.33 µg/L | 2/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 1/1 | LCR | 2025 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.9100 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
68 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Nottingham Forest S/D
Is Nottingham Forest S/D tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Nottingham Forest S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Nottingham Forest S/D's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, TTHM, Gross Beta Particle Activity, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Nottingham Forest S/D serve?
Nottingham Forest S/D reports serving 549 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Nottingham Forest S/D had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 34 violations on file for Nottingham Forest S/D, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.