Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1993-07-01 → 1994-06-16 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-01-01 → 1993-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1993-01-01 → 1993-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 727.95 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 892 µg/L | 18/21 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 725 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 800 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 5000 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 10/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 5.96 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 9/11 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 4280 µg/L 43% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 5000 µg/L | 5/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.54 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 1.178 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 1/1 | LCR | 2025 |
68 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Hardscrabble S/D
Is Hardscrabble S/D tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Hardscrabble S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Hardscrabble S/D's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Nitrate, TTHM, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Hardscrabble S/D serve?
Hardscrabble S/D reports serving 643 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Hardscrabble S/D had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 52 violations on file for Hardscrabble S/D, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.