← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Brettonwood Hills S/D

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
187
people served
37
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Cumberland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

37
health-based violations
66
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-04-01 → 2008-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-04-01 → 2008-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-04-01 → 2008-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-04-01 → 2008-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-04-01 → 2008-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
74 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
54 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
50 µg/L
No EPA limit set
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30 µg/L
No EPA limit set
13/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2025
Bromoform
7.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/15 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
268 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
9/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/15 SYR4 2012–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
LeadMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MILLIRON, BRENT
Phone
919-653-6999
Email
bmilliron@aquaamerica.com

Frequently asked questions about Brettonwood Hills S/D

Is Brettonwood Hills S/D tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Brettonwood Hills S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Brettonwood Hills S/D's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Brettonwood Hills S/D serve?

Brettonwood Hills S/D reports serving 187 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Brettonwood Hills S/D had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 66 violations on file for Brettonwood Hills S/D, of which 37 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.