Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Eastgate Sd Fayetteville Pwc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
205
people served
51
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Cumberland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

51
health-based violations
92
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-10-01 → 2006-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2006-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
89.4 µg/L 112%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
53.3 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 20/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
25.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 16/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
41.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 16/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
36.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 16/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
16.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 14/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
30.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 13/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
19.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 7/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
12.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 7/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 4/4 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 3/16 SYR4 2013–2019
3 contaminants tested, none detected
CopperLeadMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
PATEL, HARSHNA
Phone
800-525-7990
Email
harshna.patel@nexuswg.com

Frequently asked questions about Eastgate Sd Fayetteville Pwc

Is Eastgate Sd Fayetteville Pwc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Eastgate Sd Fayetteville Pwc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Eastgate Sd Fayetteville Pwc's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Eastgate Sd Fayetteville Pwc serve?

Eastgate Sd Fayetteville Pwc reports serving 205 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Eastgate Sd Fayetteville Pwc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 92 violations on file for Eastgate Sd Fayetteville Pwc, of which 51 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.