← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Chatham S/D

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
365
people served
102
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Chatham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

102
health-based violations
292
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-01-01 → 2009-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
265 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
11/15 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
64 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
20 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
2/2 LCR 2025
3 contaminants tested, none detected
LeadMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MILLIRON, BRENT
Phone
919-653-6999
Email
bmilliron@aquaamerica.com

Frequently asked questions about Chatham S/D

Is Chatham S/D tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Chatham S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Chatham S/D's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Chatham S/D serve?

Chatham S/D reports serving 365 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Chatham S/D had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 292 violations on file for Chatham S/D, of which 102 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.