Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Queens Harbor/Pier Point

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 76 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

76
contaminants tested
12
detected
310
people served
0
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Mecklenburg

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
29
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2004-02-02
Other Monitoring Resolved 2004-02-02
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1994-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1994-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1994-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1994-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-01-01 → 1990-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-01-01 → 1990-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-01-01 → 1990-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1988-01-01 → 1990-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
546.6 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 624 µg/L
13/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
375 µg/L 9.4%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 3/3 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
1.855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
5.23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Uranium
1.17636 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.1771 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.135 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
12.22 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.6 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Xylenes, Total
1.175 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
4 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 1/15 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.8 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
64 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PATEL, HARSHNA
Phone
800-525-7990
Email
harshna.patel@nexuswg.com

Frequently asked questions about Queens Harbor/Pier Point

Is Queens Harbor/Pier Point tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Queens Harbor/Pier Point's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Queens Harbor/Pier Point's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Queens Harbor/Pier Point serve?

Queens Harbor/Pier Point reports serving 310 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Queens Harbor/Pier Point had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 29 violations on file for Queens Harbor/Pier Point, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.