Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Wildlife Bay S/D

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 76 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

76
contaminants tested
10
detected
216
people served
4
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Iredell

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
6
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-06-01 → 2006-06-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2006-07-10
Other Monitoring Resolved 2006-07-10

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
2045 µg/L 157%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
 21/25 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
11 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 8/25 SYR4 2012–2018
Xylenes, Total
0.6000 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
270 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0020 mg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 3/3 LCR 2025
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
29.3 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
11.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
66 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PATEL, HARSHNA
Phone
800-525-7990
Email
harshna.patel@nexuswg.com

Frequently asked questions about Wildlife Bay S/D

Is Wildlife Bay S/D tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Wildlife Bay S/D's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wildlife Bay S/D's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Xylenes, Total, Fluoride, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wildlife Bay S/D serve?

Wildlife Bay S/D reports serving 216 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Wildlife Bay S/D had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 6 violations on file for Wildlife Bay S/D, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.