← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Ranlo, Town of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
13
detected
4,511
people served
14
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Gaston

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

14
health-based violations
104
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-07-01 → 2005-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
93 µg/L 116%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
61/61 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
51.7 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
61/61 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
68.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
31.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
56/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
54/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
53/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
11/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2025
Monochloroacetic Acid
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
65 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
1/40 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/58 SYR4 2012–2019
31 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaLeadNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
HARPER, CHARLES CJ
Email
charper@townofranlo.org

Frequently asked questions about Ranlo, Town of

Is Ranlo, Town of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Ranlo, Town of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ranlo, Town of's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ranlo, Town of serve?

Ranlo, Town of reports serving 4,511 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Ranlo, Town of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 104 violations on file for Ranlo, Town of, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.