Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2013-05-01 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1910 µg/L 147% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L | 89/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 140 µg/L 933% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 63/102 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2800 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dinoseb | 0.8000 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 7 µg/L | 9/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 240 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 4/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 8.7 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 3/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 74 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
65 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Jefferson Landing
Is Jefferson Landing tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Jefferson Landing's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Jefferson Landing's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Dinoseb, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Jefferson Landing serve?
Jefferson Landing reports serving 653 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Jefferson Landing had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 1064 violations on file for Jefferson Landing, of which 70 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.