Tap WaterIndex

← North Carolina

Tap water quality report

Cedar Wood Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
9
detected
109
people served
20
health-based violations
North Carolina rankingsLead in North CarolinaPFAS in North Carolina
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Alexander

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

20
health-based violations
91
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-10-01 → 2008-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2008-07-01 → 2008-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2006-04-01 → 2006-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
69 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
30 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 5/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 4/4 LCR 2025
Copper
378 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 1/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
4 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 1/15 SYR4 2013–2019
5 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
MILLIRON, BRENT
Phone
919-653-6999
Email
bmilliron@aquaamerica.com

Frequently asked questions about Cedar Wood Estates

Is Cedar Wood Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Cedar Wood Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Cedar Wood Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Cedar Wood Estates serve?

Cedar Wood Estates reports serving 109 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Cedar Wood Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 91 violations on file for Cedar Wood Estates, of which 20 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.