Is Energy United Water Corp Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Alexander

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2001-02-01 → 2001-02-28
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2001-02-01 → 2001-02-28
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2001-02-01 → 2001-02-28
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2001-02-01 → 2001-02-28
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2001-01-01 → 2001-01-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2001-01-01 → 2001-01-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2001-01-01 → 2001-01-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2001-01-01 → 2001-01-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2000-12-01 → 2000-12-31
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2000-12-01 → 2000-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
TTHM	84 µg/L 105% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L	127/127	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	52 µg/L 87% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L	124/124	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	71.4 µg/L No EPA limit set	100/100	SYR4	2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	26.3 µg/L No EPA limit set	100/100	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	30 µg/L No EPA limit set	100/100	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	12 µg/L No EPA limit set	98/100	SYR4	2013–2019
Copper	441 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L	82/240	SYR4	2012–2019
Lead	0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	42/42	LCR	2025
Dibromochloromethane	2 µg/L No EPA limit set	21/100	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	25 µg/L 167% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L	12/240	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set	5/100	SYR4	2013–2019

33 contaminants tested, none detected

11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact: PENNELL, SHANNON
Phone: 704-585-6518
Email: spennell@energyunitedwater.com

Frequently asked questions about Energy United Water Corp

Is Energy United Water Corp tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Energy United Water Corp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Energy United Water Corp's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Energy United Water Corp serve?

Energy United Water Corp reports serving 21,148 people in North Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Energy United Water Corp had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 44 violations on file for Energy United Water Corp, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.