Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-12-05 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-12-05 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-12-05 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-12-05 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-12-05 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2014-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 745 µg/L 57% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 968 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0100 mg/L 67% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2024 |
| Lead | 9.41 µg/L 63% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.3 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| TTHM | 52.2 µg/L 65% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 61 µg/L | 9/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 51.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 59.1 µg/L | 8/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.919 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.94 µg/L | 7/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 27.58 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.3 µg/L | 5/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 32 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Beryllium, Total | 0.6070 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.0300 pCi/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 0.5000 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene | 0.5000 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
51 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Anaconda Ccc
Is Anaconda Ccc tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Anaconda Ccc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Anaconda Ccc's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, TTHM, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Anaconda Ccc serve?
Anaconda Ccc reports serving 290 people in Montana, per its EPA record.
Has Anaconda Ccc had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 77 violations on file for Anaconda Ccc, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.