← Montana

Tap water quality report

Double Diamond Subdivision Arbor Hills

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
50
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Yellowstone

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
17
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2018-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2015-04-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-09-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-09-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-05-01 → 2014-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
473 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
5/5 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
10 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Chloroform
44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.4300 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Lead
2 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
3/15 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
55 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
39 µg/L 65%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2017–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
STONE, SPENCER M
Phone
406-652-5523
Email
spencer@thewaterman.com

Frequently asked questions about Double Diamond Subdivision Arbor Hills

Is Double Diamond Subdivision Arbor Hills tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Double Diamond Subdivision Arbor Hills's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Double Diamond Subdivision Arbor Hills's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Double Diamond Subdivision Arbor Hills serve?

Double Diamond Subdivision Arbor Hills reports serving 50 people in Montana, per its EPA record.

Has Double Diamond Subdivision Arbor Hills had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for Double Diamond Subdivision Arbor Hills, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.