Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2000-10-01 → 2000-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-09-01 → 2022-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 526.1 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 559 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0150 mg/L 100% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 1340 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 12/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 7.6 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 7/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 7.8 µg/L 78% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1818.5 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1940 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Combined Uranium | 31.6 µg/L 105% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 13.952 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.9 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 45.8 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 46 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2013 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.2105 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.39 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 6.5315 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.83 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 1 µg/L 1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2013 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.5925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.64 µg/L | 2/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.07 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate | 2.67 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.3600 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.01 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 0.6900 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Picloram | 0.4050 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 500 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.37 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.06 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
52 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Forest Park Water Users Association
Is Forest Park Water Users Association tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Forest Park Water Users Association's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Forest Park Water Users Association's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Forest Park Water Users Association serve?
Forest Park Water Users Association reports serving 323 people in Montana, per its EPA record.
Has Forest Park Water Users Association had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 115 violations on file for Forest Park Water Users Association, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.