Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-12-30 → 1994-01-29 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1993-12-30 → 1994-01-29 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-10-19 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 1999-10-19 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1994-01-01 → 1994-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1994-01-01 → 1994-01-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.00090 mg/L 6% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2023 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about South Newton Rural W/A #2
Is South Newton Rural W/A #2 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 1 contaminant in South Newton Rural W/A #2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in South Newton Rural W/A #2's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does South Newton Rural W/A #2 serve?
South Newton Rural W/A #2 reports serving 275 people in Mississippi, per its EPA record.
Has South Newton Rural W/A #2 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 7 violations on file for South Newton Rural W/A #2, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.