← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Sycamore Springs

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 69 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

69
contaminants tested
7
detected
470
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Jefferson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
21
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-12-01 → 2012-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-12-01 → 2012-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-12-01 → 2012-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-12-01 → 2012-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-04-01 → 2011-04-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
32.1 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
11/12 SYR4 2015–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
Barium
121 µg/L 6.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Fluoride
220 µg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Chromium
3.45 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.1 pCi/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
1.03 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/12 SYR4 2015–2019
62 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
EVANS, KATHY
Phone
636-465-6446
Email
KEVANS@PLNDV.COM

Frequently asked questions about Sycamore Springs

Is Sycamore Springs tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Sycamore Springs's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Sycamore Springs's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Barium, Fluoride, Chromium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Sycamore Springs serve?

Sycamore Springs reports serving 470 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Sycamore Springs had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 21 violations on file for Sycamore Springs, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.