Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-10-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2017-10-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 234.6 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 316 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0015 mg/L 10% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 8.004 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.15 µg/L | 4/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 4.85 pCi/L 97% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 5 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Barium | 38.43 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.5 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.095 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.2355 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.25 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chromium | 7.3835 µg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.59 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.853 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.86 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1875.5 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1880 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 10 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 7.0935 µg/L 8.9% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.11 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
58 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Majestic Lakes
Is Majestic Lakes tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Majestic Lakes's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Majestic Lakes's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Majestic Lakes serve?
Majestic Lakes reports serving 512 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Majestic Lakes had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for Majestic Lakes, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.