← Missouri

Tap water quality report

St Charles Co Pwsd #2 Wright City

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 102 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

102
contaminants tested
22
detected
3,550
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Warren

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
73
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-10-01 → 1992-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1991-07-01 → 1991-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
939 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
68/68 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
820 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
32/62 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
24.3 µg/L 162%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
28/68 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.6%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2025
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
4.1 pCi/L 82%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
12/12 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
67.1 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
9.51 µg/L 9.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
1500 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
3.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
14 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lithium
62.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2025
Bromodichloromethane
21.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
15.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
19.7 pCi/L 131%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2014
Xylenes, Total
3.54 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2014–2017
2,4-D
2.48 µg/L 3.5%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
2.38 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Ethylbenzene
0.8600 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
23.6 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.09 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.02 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
80 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WRIGHT, JIM
Phone
636-385-5197
Email
jwright@waterdistrict2.com

Frequently asked questions about St Charles Co Pwsd #2 Wright City

Is St Charles Co Pwsd #2 Wright City tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in St Charles Co Pwsd #2 Wright City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in St Charles Co Pwsd #2 Wright City's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does St Charles Co Pwsd #2 Wright City serve?

St Charles Co Pwsd #2 Wright City reports serving 3,550 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has St Charles Co Pwsd #2 Wright City had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 73 violations on file for St Charles Co Pwsd #2 Wright City, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.