Is James River Addition Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: Ground water
Ownership: Private
Counties served: Greene

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2010-03-14
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1995-06-01 → 1995-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1991-07-01 → 1991-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1991-06-26 → 1991-07-25
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1991-05-01 → 1991-05-31
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1991-01-09 → 1991-02-08
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-01-01 → 2013-12-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2013-01-01 → 2013-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	63.1 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L	13/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.00065 mg/L 4.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	12/12	LCR	2025
Barium	87.2 µg/L 4.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L	3/3	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	1.86 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L	3/13	SYR4	2013–2019
Chromium	1.49 µg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L	1/3	SYR4	2013–2019

57 contaminants tested, none detected

1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNitrate-NitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact: MATHEWSON, ROD
Phone: 417-343-1064
Email: rmathewson12@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about James River Addition

Is James River Addition tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in James River Addition's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in James River Addition's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Barium, Lead, Chromium. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does James River Addition serve?

James River Addition reports serving 240 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has James River Addition had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 45 violations on file for James River Addition, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.