Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2008-01-01 → 2008-01-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 177/177 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 88.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 177/177 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 50.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 177/177 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 93.2 µg/L 117% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 177/177 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 107.7 µg/L 180% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 177/177 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 53.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 176/177 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 172/177 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1020 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 112/137 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 8.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 95/177 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 4110 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 48/164 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 200 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 34/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 4110 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 24/82 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/177 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0040 mg/L 27% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 20/20 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 11 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 19/115 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 367 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 12/115 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 8 pCi/L 53% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 10/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Lithium | 27.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/18 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Chromium | 0.7000 µg/L 0.7% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 7/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.8 pCi/L 36% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 7/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2016 |
| Atrazine | 0.7000 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L | 2/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 0.8000 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 2/52 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 2,4-D | 0.3000 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 1/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.1500 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 1/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Mo American Joplin
Is Mo American Joplin tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Mo American Joplin's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Mo American Joplin's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Mo American Joplin serve?
Mo American Joplin reports serving 73,728 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Mo American Joplin had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Mo American Joplin, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.