Tap WaterIndex

← Missouri

Tap water quality report

North Hills Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 69 contaminants and detected 10. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

69
contaminants tested
10
detected
150
people served
4
health-based violations
Missouri rankingsLead in MissouriPFAS in Missouri
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Cape Girardeau

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
26
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-03-01 → 1999-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-03-01 → 1999-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1999-03-01 → 1999-03-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1991-06-05 → 1991-07-04
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0033 mg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 24/24 LCR 2024
Copper
176 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 17/17 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate-Nitrite
50 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 8/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
10 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 6/17 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
15.7 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.2 pCi/L 64%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
 3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
360 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
1.62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
5.75 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/3 SYR4 2013–2018
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTTHMTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WOLFSBERGER, TYLER
Email
tyler.wolfsberger@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about North Hills Estates

Is North Hills Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in North Hills Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in North Hills Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Nitrate-Nitrite, Lead, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does North Hills Estates serve?

North Hills Estates reports serving 150 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has North Hills Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 26 violations on file for North Hills Estates, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.