Tap WaterIndex

← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 13. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
13
detected
3,360
people served
0
health-based violations
Missouri rankingsLead in MissouriPFAS in Missouri
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Scotland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
4
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
Other Monitoring Resolved 2013-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2003-07-01
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-01-01 → 1992-01-31
MR Monitoring Archived 1992-01-01 → 1992-01-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0120 µg/L 3/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
20.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 54/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
129 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 54/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 54/54 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
153 µg/L 191%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 54/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
35.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 53/53 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
44.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 52/53 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
188 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 50/50 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
81.6 µg/L 136%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
 50/53 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 19/19 LCR 2024
Lead
4.46 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 7/50 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
9.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/53 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.38 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 4/53 SYR4 2013–2019
31 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
BRADLEY, TONYA
Phone
660-465-7200
Email
sccoralw@nemr.net

Frequently asked questions about Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1

Is Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1 serve?

Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1 reports serving 3,360 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 4 violations on file for Scotland County Cons Pwsd 1, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.