← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Nodaway County Pwsd 1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
14
detected
6,428
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Nodaway

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
8
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-10-01 → 2015-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-05-01 → 2013-05-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0096 µg/L 3/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
266 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
74.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
49/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
14.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
48/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.47 µg/L
No EPA limit set
48/54 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
91.6 µg/L 115%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
48/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
44/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
43.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
41/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
73.5 µg/L 123%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
41/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0014 mg/L 9.4%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
24/24 LCR 2024
Lead
8.56 µg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
24/60 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.89 µg/L
No EPA limit set
17/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
15.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
13/54 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/54 SYR4 2013–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
WILSON, NORMAN
Phone
660-582-5011

Frequently asked questions about Nodaway County Pwsd 1

Is Nodaway County Pwsd 1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Nodaway County Pwsd 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Nodaway County Pwsd 1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Nodaway County Pwsd 1 serve?

Nodaway County Pwsd 1 reports serving 6,428 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Nodaway County Pwsd 1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 8 violations on file for Nodaway County Pwsd 1, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.