Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0095 µg/L | 2/20 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 384 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 42.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 48/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 110 µg/L No EPA limit set | 48/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 27.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 48/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 40.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 48/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 138 µg/L 173% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 48/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 64 µg/L 107% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 48/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 27.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 48/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 20.7 µg/L 138% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 24/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.55 µg/L No EPA limit set | 22/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0015 mg/L 9.9% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2024 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 10.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 18/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 25 µg/L No EPA limit set | 13/20 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Bromoform | 3.67 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 18.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/48 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
28 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2
Is Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2 serve?
Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2 reports serving 7,180 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.
Has Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 60 violations on file for Laf Jo Saline County Cons Pwsd 2, of which 60 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.