Tap WaterIndex

← Missouri

Tap water quality report

Concordia

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 69 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

69
contaminants tested
19
detected
2,500
people served
38
health-based violations
Missouri rankingsLead in MissouriPFAS in Missouri
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Lafayette

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

38
health-based violations
76
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 2026-01-01 → 2026-03-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-09-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-09-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-09-01 → 2014-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chlorite
580 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 790 µg/L
262/285 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
13.505 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.9 µg/L
90/90 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
80.565 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 102 µg/L
90/90 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.437 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.24 µg/L
90/90 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
95.06 µg/L 119%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 119 µg/L
82/82 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
45.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 59.9 µg/L
81/81 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
41.79 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58.4 µg/L
79/81 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
69.75 µg/L 116%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
76/81 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
499.15 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 634 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
4.6635 µg/L 155%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.31 µg/L
30/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 24/24 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
16.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L
18/81 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1490 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
77.31 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 79.9 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
223 µg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
1.875 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.92 µg/L
7/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
1.48 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/81 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
0.5200 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
50 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
NIERMAN, KALEB
Phone
660-463-2286
Email
concordiawatertreatment@centurytel.net

Frequently asked questions about Concordia

Is Concordia tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Concordia's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Concordia's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Concordia serve?

Concordia reports serving 2,500 people in Missouri, per its EPA record.

Has Concordia had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 76 violations on file for Concordia, of which 38 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.