← Minnesota

Tap water quality report

Woodlund Mobile Home Park

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 38 contaminants and detected 6. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

38
contaminants tested
6
detected
330
people served
9
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Washington

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

9
health-based violations
9
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-05-01 → 1992-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
197.9 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 242 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
12.15 µg/L 81%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.8 µg/L
6/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
150 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
22.2 µg/L 1.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Fluoride
200 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2012
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
1/1 LCR 2023
32 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UMercurySeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Phone
6129909225
Email
jscheerz@summitre.net

Frequently asked questions about Woodlund Mobile Home Park

Is Woodlund Mobile Home Park tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 6 contaminants in Woodlund Mobile Home Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Woodlund Mobile Home Park's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Barium, Fluoride, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Woodlund Mobile Home Park serve?

Woodlund Mobile Home Park reports serving 330 people in Minnesota, per its EPA record.

Has Woodlund Mobile Home Park had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Woodlund Mobile Home Park, of which 9 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.